(Dir: Clint Eastwood, 2011)
Since the release of
Hereafter it’s become impossible for me to approach any film directed by Clint
Eastwood without a degree of wariness. Eastwood is proving to be an
incredibly prolific director in these supposed twilight years of his career and
has made some recent interesting films (Gran Torino, Changeling), but it seems a by-product of such prolificness is that quality control can fall by the way side. I mention Hereafter as without any
exaggeration it’s the worst film I have seen in a good few years. So
with this in mind it was with a degree of trepidation I went in to watch
Eastwood’s latest effort, J. Edgar, his biopic of the infamous FBI Director J.
Edgar Hoover.
Hoover was the man
who essentially established the FBI, bringing it to what it is today, as well as being a strong advocate for the use of science
as a tool for detecting criminals, such as creating a central database of
fingerprints. The film jumps between the key early days of the FBI and
Hoover in the 1960’s, particularly in the Kennedy era. Leonardo DiCaprio
stars in the title role and puts in an excellent performance. Playing the Director
in his formative years he’s believable as a determined young man with a strong
ideology and passionate anti-communist agenda, whilst, behind layers of ageing
make-up, he convincingly transforms into a 70 year old holding onto his position
of office through fear and a desire for control. DiCaprio yet again proves that he's one of the most talented actors working today.
Armie Hammer and
Naomi Watts provide solid support as Hoover’s second in command Clyde
Tolson and secretary Helen, both of whom have committed themselves to Hoover and the agency for life. Although it's fair to say they fare less well in the ageing make-up stakes, with Hammer
particularly looking more and more plastic as the older he gets. Judi Dench also pops up playing
Hoover’s mother and she does well in a small role, but these days she does seem
to be becoming more of a caricature of herself, as was also the case in My Week
With Marilyn.
The film is really
well shot with the colour throughout slightly saturated towards colder
colours, giving an interesting effect that heightens the believability of the
period settings. I was reminded of Eastwood’s Changeling which had a
similar look and feel, both of which Tom Stern was the director of photography
on. The direction is on the whole pretty decent, there’s nothing too showy and the film is anchored around a standard flashback structure, although
it is a slow film and does really drag into the last half hour, which seems to
be a result of the story.
The story they decided to tell is my biggest issue with J. Edgar. Hoover appeared to live by the edict that
‘knowledge is power’, and was the king of the wiretap. He is known
to have authorised countless illegal recordings of the powerful and famous in
compromising situations, which he kept for his own secret files to be used as he required. This seemed to be a way to keep control of his
position as Director of the FBI for life, but perhaps it was also to influence
societal change (see his hatred of communism or the SCLC), or maybe they were
just gathered for his own illicit pleasures? Even if it wasn’t for any of
these reasons he was still seemingly a much despised figure, someone that each
newly elected President wanted to replace but ultimately the dirt he held on each meant they were too scared to get rid of him. Unfortunately the film doesn’t go into
too much detail on this side of things, which I’d argue is the most fascinating
aspect of the man and is ripe for far greater exploration. Instead J. Edgar just gives the
impression that this was going on in the background whilst primarily focusing on the shaping of the FBI and the importance of the Lindbergh kidnapping to
the agency, and also attempting, somewhat unsatisfactorily, to explore the ambiguity of Hoover’s
sexuality.
There's nothing particularly wrong with J. Edgar - it’s a well made film covering a
fascinating part of American history, with another excellent performance by DiCaprio. It’s just
a shame that it’s ultimately a semi-interesting film about a very interesting
person.
No comments:
Post a Comment