It’s amazing
how regularly a series of horror films becomes victim to the law of diminishing returns. Disappointingly the [REC] series has fallen
very deeply into this trap, offering less and less as we progress. [REC] was one of the best horror films
of the last decade, plain and simple. It’s
effectiveness stemmed primarily from the first person perspective, the isolation,
a genuine feeling of no escape and the intensity this built too. I discuss the film in a bit more detail somewhere amidst a lengthy exegesis on my recent feelings on horror – here. [REC]2 tried to ape its
predecessors success, utilising the same setting but with more frustrating plot
points and a major misjudgement in giving the protagonists automatic weapons to go up
against the infected. When the odds are
stacked like that and with the extended rattle of gunfire, the efficacy of such
potentially creepy environments quickly dissipates.
And so to [REC]3: Génesis,
the third installment that genuinely offers something different to what got us
to this point. We’re no longer in a
quarantined city apartment block we’re at a wedding reception out in a slightly
more rural area. It’s Clara (Leticia
Dolera) and Koldo’s (Diego Martín) day; we watch them get married and move onto the
reception where things inevitably turn into a fight for survival, as the events
we’ve previously seen unfold in the city reach them.
I quite
liked this as a setting for a zombie movie - a lot of people in one place and a
big building with a number of rooms/settings can be interesting and gives
plenty of scope for not knowing what’s around the corner. Both Dolera and Martín do a decent enough job as the leads and are both pretty likeable with a clear goal that extends beyond just survival. It’s impressive how beautiful Dolera manages
to look covered in blood, make-up running and with her wedding dress ravaged. None of this is enough to create an effective horror film though.
The
biggest problem ultimately stems from the direction. This is a horror film without any scares or jumps - the antithesis of the first film. Most of the horror comes from seeing people
covered in blood and looking zombified, until the latter part when the film
decides to get into the business of trying to be more graphic. Strange then that although this is welcomed
it feels dissonant with how tame the rest of the film is. Then there’s the really clunky way in which
religion is brought back in to explain events. It’s not new as it was very subtly there in the first film and more prevalent
in the second, but here it just feels cheap and badly shoehorned in.
Camerawork
is also something of a notable point. The first twenty minutes establish the film in the vein we’ve gotten
used to with handheld footage cutting between three different camera
perspectives. And then suddenly we’re
watching a more traditional film for the duration, which
immediately robs the story of any potency. The thing is it’s actually really well shot with some great looking
scenes, but that’s pretty meaningless when it’s not actually aiding the story. This change to a traditional style also means
there’s a score over the film, but it isn’t very good, regularly feeling out of
place and jarring when all it should be doing is enhancing.
[REC]
never needed a sequel and it certainly never needed a third of fourth
film. It’s commendable that something
different has been tried in [REC]3: Génesis, as the original idea had already given all it could
during the first sequel, but we’re not presented with anything better here. Yes there are a couple of good ideas but they’re
not enough to cover for what is essentially a pretty lacklustre horror film. Director Paco Plazo co-directed and co-wrote
the first two films alongside Jaume Balagueró, and Balagueró is separately working on the fourth (and hopefully final) film, [REC]
Apocalypse. It’ll be interesting to see
how that compares and which one of the pair really is the better director. Either way I can’t see myself ever having a
desire to watch these sequels again – the lack of any decent horror and law of
diminishing returns is too great.
No comments:
Post a Comment